When is asexual reproduction more common

Researchers recently tested a theory developed in the s by John Maynard Smith suggesting that sex is a more costly reproductive strategy than asexual reproduction. Mathematically, he showed that asexual females make more grandchildren than sexual females. For sexual females, approximately half their offspring must be sons, and those sons can't physically bear grandchildren. Asexual females don't make sons, so they make twice as many daughters as sexual females. Maynard Smith called this cost of sex the "two-fold cost of males.

In this latest research, investigators studied the snail Potamopyrgus antipodarum, which has two kinds of females: one is asexual and the other is sexual and produces both sons and daughters. Asexual females coexist with sexual females in lakes and streams in New Zealand. Otto, S. Resolving the paradox of sex and recombination. Nature Reviews Genetics 3 , — link to article. Origins of New Genes and Pseudogenes. Evolutionary Adaptation in the Human Lineage.

Genetic Mutation. Negative Selection. Sexual Reproduction and the Evolution of Sex. Haldane's Rule: the Heterogametic Sex. Hybrid Incompatibility and Speciation. Hybridization and Gene Flow. Why Should We Care about Species? Citation: Otto, S. Nature Education 1 1 What, then, are the true costs and benefits of sex? Aa Aa Aa. The Importance of Sexual Reproduction. Indeed, theoretical models developed in the s and s demonstrate that genes promoting sex and recombination increase in frequency only when all of the following conditions hold true: The population is under directional selection.

This means that increased variation can improve the response to selection. Fitness surfaces are negatively curved. This means that sex and recombination can restore variation eliminated by past selection. The surface curvature is not too strong. If too strong, the recombination load is severe. Genetics 78 , — Otto, S. Article History Close. Share Cancel.

Revoke Cancel. Keywords Keywords for this Article. Save Cancel. Flag Inappropriate The Content is: Objectionable.

Flag Content Cancel. Email your Friend. Submit Cancel. This content is currently under construction. Explore This Subject. Genome Evolution.

Topic rooms within Evolutionary Genetics Close. No topic rooms are there. Or Browse Visually. Other Topic Rooms Genetics. Student Voices. Creature Cast. Simply Science. The advantages of asexual reproduction include:. The disadvantages of sexual reproduction:. The disadvantages of asexual reproduction include:. Bacteria, such as E. An advantage of this is that they can produce many bacteria very quickly.

A disadvantage is that all of the bacteria are genetically identical. If an antibiotic was used on the bacteria, then all of them would die. The population would be wiped out.

Studies by scientists at the University of California, Santa Barbara show that sexual reproduction wins out, in an evolutionary sense, over asexual reproduction in a major study that included 34 experiments with the common fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster. Specifically, they discovered that the rate of progressive evolution the accumulation of beneficial mutations is faster in populations that reproduce sexually.

Rice, first author and professor of biology at the UC, Santa Barbara. And yet, look out the window and almost every organism you see reproduces sexually. The math is simple: with four asexual adults females you get eight offspring, but with two males and two females you get only four offspring.

In other words, the asexual population grows twice as fast as the sexually reproducing one. The second part of the mathematical advantage is that the asexual adult female is able to put all of her genes into the next generation, whereas with sexual reproduction, each individual is responsible for only half of the genetic information in the offspring. Only half of my genome is getting into the population. However, if I were an asexual female, my offspring would carry all of my genome.

I would put twice as many genes into the next generation. With asexual reproduction you get two times as many offspring and two times as many genes into the population.

There is a broad assumption in this scenario that males do not help with the care and feeding of offspring, although in a small proportion of species they do help: people, wolves, foxes and most songbirds.