Can you be a conservative libertarian
Did you hear about conservative libertarians? They believe that it is up to the individual to decide what is right for themselves rather than making ridiculous laws that are aimed at 5 people, but directly effect the rest of the state's population! Like the 21 drinking age! John: Yeah, I heard! And one of their best beliefs is to disregard all religious thinking when running the country to get things done, thinking on morality rather than religion.
Jim: Exactly! It's a shame that they haven't run the country yet because of the damn sheeple we have in this country Lots of rich people support higher personal income taxes. Like people donating money to study diseases that killed their loved ones. Obviously not a selfish preference, but still one motivated by personal experience. Somewhat related: Many states bar former convicts from voting.
A libertarian is a conservative who has been oppressed Categories: Economics of Health Care Liberty. Steve Jun 1 at pm. Scott Sumner Jun 1 at pm. Scott Sumner Jun 2 at pm. I suspect the government policy shaped preferences in some way over time? Or perhaps there are network effects involved in both cases?
Mark Z Jun 7 at am. Thomas Hutcheson Jun 2 at am. Steve Jun 2 at am. Thomas Hutcheson Jun 4 at pm. Mark Z Jun 1 at pm. Roger McKinney Jun 1 at pm.
Mark Jun 1 at pm. Mark Z Jun 2 at am. Thomas B Jun 2 at pm. TMC Jun 2 at pm. Quite right, maybe it should be a conservative is a liberal who has learned from experience. Mark Z Jun 3 at am. Phil H Jun 2 at pm. Anonymous Jun 3 at pm. Mark Z Jun 3 at pm. Phil H Jun 3 at pm. Phil H Jun 9 at pm. Progressive Left? Or somewhere in between? If you had to choose, would you rather have…. A smaller government providing fewer services. A bigger government providing more services. When you say you favor a bigger government providing more services, do you think it would be better to….
Modestly expand on current government services. Greatly expand on current government services. Which of the following statements come closest to your view? If America is too open to people from all over the world, we risk losing our identity as a nation. In general, would you say experts who study a subject for many years are….
Thinking about increased trade of goods and services between the U. Gained more than it has lost because increased trade has helped lower prices and increased the competitiveness of some U. Lost more than it has gained because increased trade has cost jobs in manufacturing and other industries and lowered wages for some U.
How much more, if anything, needs to be done to ensure equal rights for all Americans regardless of their racial or ethnic backgrounds? A lot. Nothing at all. This was probably an easier project for us than for our counterparts because the current Constitution is fundamentally a libertarian or, more precisely, classical liberal document.
As we put in our introduction , however. Our task was therefore largely to clarify and sharpen those provisions—most notably the Commerce Clause, which has been transformed by legal interpretation into a charter of expansive federal power far beyond what the framers envisioned. Of course, there have been some developments in the years since the original Constitution and Bill of Rights took effect and the years since the post-Civil War amendments were ratified, that have demonstrated certain deficiencies from a libertarian perspective.
Out-of-control spending necessitates a balanced budget requirement except in emergencies. We also circumscribed executive power as did the other groups in certain ways , including by allowing for impeachment of federal officials for "behavior that renders them unfit for office. Not surprisingly, this team emphasized democracy and equality, while pushing back against the idea that the current Constitution is antithetical to progressive government.
In what was a surprise to me, however, they added very few positive rights or entitlements. As these scholars wrote in their introduction :. Accordingly, we took this exercise as an opportunity to strengthen those structural protections for democratic government that we believe serve the exercise of individual rights. We believe that embedding democracy more effectively in our Constitution will better protect rights than an explicit description of each and every right.
As progressives, we believe in democracy rather than government by judiciary, and that is why we have approached the document in this fashion. At the heart of our progressive Constitution is an accountable and inclusive political process. The Progressives added an explicit right to vote, eliminated the Electoral College, and made the Senate more democratic.
0コメント