Can you practice law with an llm

This side by side comparison of the JD and LLM provides a fundamental understanding of the key differences between these two law degrees:. JD: Standard curriculum covering broad theories and concepts within the U.

The JD degree is the standard educational requirement for practicing law in the United States. Department of Education as the national agency for the accreditation of programs leading to the JD degree, currently accredits schools that offer JD degrees. All ABA-accredited schools with a JD program provide students with a legal education that meets a minimum set of standards set forth by the Council and Accreditation Committee of the Section of Legal Education and Admissions to the Bar.

All U. Many state boards of examiners do not allow graduates of non-ABA-accredited JD programs to sit for the bar examination. The ABA does not recommend any specific undergraduate major or group of courses to prepare for a legal education, and students of JD programs can come from nearly any academic discipline.

These programs may also offer practical opportunities to improve these skills, such as in-class exercises supervised by a professor or internships with real cases supervised by a practicing lawyer or attorney. Many law professionals may consider becoming a judge, which typically requires many years of experience as a practicing lawyer.

A JD provides you with the first step of training necessary to take this career path. Those who want a career in politics may pursue a JD to become familiar with the law. A JD may also help aspiring politicians gain valuable critical thinking and public speaking skills.

Both the LLM and JD are advanced degrees that lawyers obtain at various points in their education and career, but there are some key differences to be aware of, including:. Some professionals pursue a pre-law program in their undergraduate studies, often in political science, history, English or another liberal arts discipline.

Some may complete degrees in other disciplines and may pursue a JD to specialize their law practice in issues related to that field, such as business, finance or healthcare. A lawyer who qualified abroad may also be required to take an English-language proficiency test if English is not their native language.

Related: 10 Popular History Degree Jobs. While all lawyers who practice in the U. A JD is a broad program of study that allows students to understand the foundations of law and interact with all aspects to have a comprehensive experience of practicing law.

An LLM is more narrowly focused and allows students to specialize in particular aspects of law. Please let me know. Thank you. But then an LLB wouldn't either because to practice law in England you have to do a training course of one year to either become a barrister or a solicitor. If you don't have an LLB with certain set subjects you have to do an extra preparatory year in addition to that. Although you argue "Makes sense that because it is an LLM that there would be no problem to study law" the problem is not that you can't study law but that law varies from jurisdiction to jurisdiction.

There are probably other requirements if you are professionally as opposed to academically qualified in Canada but I don't know what they are. Having reread your message and realised you have a B. Comm not a law degree I guess one of the other problems would be that while you might be ok in a commerical LLM you have none of the basics such as Criminal, Land law etc that someone practicing law probably should have. Even if you were to go into quite a specialised area of law you still might need to have a basic idea of other areas and the likelihood on the info you gave us is that you don't.

Hi there, Thank you for the comments to my question. I understand that I would definately have had to do a conversion course if I had chosen a field that was not related to my original specilty, but I do not want to practice law that is not commercially related, so therefore I was allowed to bypass the conversion course that most people would have had to do if their undergrad was not in law.

It does not make sense to have to go back after a masters to do a conversion course to get into your masters. Lets think about that one.

So your point is that I can practice law after the training course , but you worry about all other requirements that seem to be required of someone who has not yet entered the LLM. I would hope that allowing me into the LLM would open doors into a future law career.

What do you think? No that's not my point. My point is that you will have to do a 2 year as opposed to 1 year training course. Newsroom Events Campus Community. Admission Requirements. Student Life. Living Here. Spiritual Life.